A note to readers: the content of this post was developed as a submission to a review panel convened by Canada’s National Housing Council. The Council is part of Canada’s new framework to progressively achieve the right to adequate housing. The review panel is mandated to investigate the financialization of purpose-built rental housing.
Discussions about housing and health often proceed on separate tracks. Matthew Desmond’s book Evicted, is an exception. Following the lives of tenants, Desmond documents the impacts of eviction on tenants’ mental and physical health. Landlords initiate evictions and in doing so are linked with tenants’ health outcomes.
The UN provides specific safeguards for evictions, as part of its guidance on the right to adequate housing. In the context of evictions, Desmond’s work describes a connection between health and the right to adequate housing.
Does this connection extend beyond evictions to other aspects of the landlord-tenant relationship? This post contends that determinants of health research (DOH) is an important field for answering this question. Determinants of health research:
- identifies groups of people who experience poor health outcomes. This is significant because the groups of people who experience poor health outcomes are aligned with groups of people who do not experience the right to adequate housing. It means that poor health outcomes and the right to adequate housing can be considered as the same issue. It also means that changes in housing that improve health outcomes will also register as the progressive achievement of the right to adequate housing.
- provides evidence of negative health outcomes that are related to four specific aspects of housing. These are areas to focus on in order to see improvements.
- documents the connections between business practices and poor health outcomes. This provides guidance for:
- identifying activities in the purpose-built rental housing sector that may contribute to poor health outcomes and undermine progress in achieving the right to adequate housing.
- collecting information to monitor and evaluate the effectiveness of the existing framework for regulating housing.
- revising regulatory frameworks to support a purpose built-rental housing sector that is economically robust, improves health outcomes for tenants and progressively achieves the right to adequate housing.
This post has four parts:
Part 1 discusses the convergence of social determinants of health research (Social DOH) and the right to adequate housing.
Part 2 identifies how landlord activities are connected with health outcomes and human rights outcomes.
Part 3 discusses whether the size of a landlord’s portfolio of properties has any bearing on housing rights. This section also considers the utility of commercial determinants of health research (Commercial DOH) in the context of purpose-built rental housing.
Part 4 introduces a framework that health researchers have developed during their study of Commercial DOH. The section also discusses the utility of the framework in the context of purpose-built rental housing.
Part 1: Convergence of social determinants of health research and the right to adequate housing
Social determinants of health research (Social DOH) studies the links between social factors and health outcomes. Social DOH has established links between negative health outcomes and specific population groups, including visible minorities, people who are gay, lesbian, bisexual, queer, or two spirited and people with low incomes.
These specific groups align with groups that are recognized to experience discrimination in international human rights law:
“race, colour, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status. . . . ‘Other status’ may include disability, health status (e.g., HIV/AIDS) or sexual orientation.”
Human rights legislation in Canada includes people with disabilities and Indigenous people among the groups that experience human rights violations.
The alignment among these groups suggests that poor health outcomes in a specific population are indicative of human rights violations. Social DOH supports the claims of people who experience human rights violations.
Social DOH makes a further contribution by identifying specific characteristics of housing that contribute to poor health outcomes. Because the groups that experience poor health outcomes are coincident with groups that experience discrimination in human rights law, the characteristics of housing that contribute to poor health outcomes take on a particular significance in human rights claims.
There are four characteristics:
- Cost – The cost of housing affects decisions about other expenditures, including paying for prescription medications and health care. Where housing costs are high compared to income, household heads have higher levels of stress and anxiety.
- Condition – The quality of housing materials affect chronic health conditions. Asbestos and lead pipes are two known examples. Also, exposed wiring and poor maintenance contribute to trips and falls, especially amongst older adults.
- Consistency – This is about stability. Evictions, foreclosures and other forms of forced moves contribute to anxiety and elevated stress levels. Consistency highlights living arrangements with the potential for an unplanned move, for example where landlords do not need a reason to evict sitting tenants.
- Context – This refers to the features of a neighbourhood. Walkable neighbourhoods support healthy life choices, access to fresh food, places to meet neighbours and to exercise outdoors. When these features are missing, residents face higher levels of stress and live with a greater risk to personal safety.
It is argued here that one or all of these characteristics of housing are also grounds for making human rights claims as follows:
- The groups of people who experience negative health outcomes from housing conditions are the same as the groups of people identified as experiencing discrimination in human rights law.
- For people in these groups who experience poor health outcomes, the cost, condition, continuity and context of housing should be considered grounds for making human rights claims.
Part 2: How landlord activities are connected with health outcomes and human rights outcomes
The previous section identifies four housing characteristics that may also be grounds for human rights claims. These grounds will be of particular interest if that they are connected with landlords in general and landlords in purpose-built rental housing in particular.
All landlords potentially have a direct role in each of the characteristics of housing described above: Cost, Condition, Consistency, and Context. Landlords are in a position to affect:
- Cost – Landlords set the amount of rent charged and any subsequent increases or decreases in rent levels.
- Condition – Landlords determine the level of building maintenance and upkeep on their properties.
- Consistency – Landlords have the authority to affect consistency through their ability to evict tenants.
- Context – Landlords have the authority to affect context as part of the process of deciding whether to rent a unit to a tenant who applies.
This brief listing establishes that landlord actions are connected with health outcomes and human rights.
Part 3: Does the size of a landlord’s portfolio of properties have any bearing on health outcomes and housing rights?
There are some large landlords operating rental properties in Canada. Some of the best known are real estate investment trusts (REITs), which have been increasing their share of Canada’s stock of purpose-built rental housing. REITs are not the only large businesses with sizeable housing portfolios. Does size matter?
Commercial determinants of health research (Commercial DOH) suggests that size could be an issue. This field of research emerged while studying groups of people with higher rates of cancer, diabetes and other non-communicable diseases. Health researchers identified marketing and sales strategies that encouraged consumers to engage in unhealthy practices, such as smoking and drinking sugar loaded drinks. The companies paying for these marketing and sales strategies were very large businesses.
As the health research continued, it became evident that the large businesses were acting in multiple ways that added on to the poor health outcomes that were showing up in specific populations. Here are three business practices that have been documented:
- opposing the introduction of regulations to protect consumers in the legal system, arguing that it interfered with business operations.
- funding research which challenges evidence of business practices that contribute to poor health outcomes.
- supporting “grass roots” citizens’ groups to intervene in processes to set public policy.
Health researchers identified two common elements across the illnesses they were studying. In every case, the actors were very large corporations. As well, there were marked declines in the health outcomes of people consuming the products.
This experience suggests that landlord size could have a negative impact on health outcomes for tenants. It certainly deserves concerted study. The four characteristics of housing that affect health outcomes (cost, consistency, condition and context) should be a starting point.
Part 4: A framework for the commercial determinants of health
In their study of Commercial DOH, researchers have developed a framework for organizing and analyzing business practices. The framework is useful because it incorporates practices that are directly related to the production and sale of commercial products as well as practices that affect health outcomes indirectly.
All businesses that sell products to consumers engage in direct practices to improve their bottom line. For example, to improve income, businesses advertise their products. Businesses also engage in practices to keep the cost of their products as low as possible, for example by shifting the site of production to a place where labour costs are low.
Health researchers have identified multiple additional practices that are indirectly related to the production and sale of products. The three examples listed above in Part 3 are examples of indirect practices. Here are two more:
- making donations to community projects, and
- intervening in processes to create regulations to protect consumers.
Health researchers found similarities in the indirect practices across product sectors. It also became evident that indirect practices have a bearing on health outcomes.
Health researchers started working on a mental map that could hold all the indirect practices that could potentially affect health outcomes. The result is a Commercial DOH framework, which incorporates all of the direct and indirect practices.
Health researchers have identified common features among the commercial actors that participate in indirect practices. The commercial actors are large. They have complex ownership structures. The complexity makes it more challenging to identify where the large organizations are directing their resources.
The Commercial DOH framework may have utility in the housing sector. Martine August and others have been tracing the activities of companies with large housing portfolios. Like the companies studied in Commercial DOH, the corporate structures in companies with large housing portfolios are complex and multi-layered. There is also evidence of activity by large landlords across sectors in the housing market, which is consistent with health research about the Commercial DOH. With these similarities, it is worth considering the utility of the Commercial DOH framework in the realm of housing.
Part 5: Conclusions
Housing conditions influence human health. No less than four characteristics of housing can have a profoundly negative impact on health: cost, condition, continuity and context. Any or all of these impacts can abrogate the human right to affordable housing.
- Each of the four characteristics are affected by landlord practices.
- Commercial DOH suggests that the size of the portfolio controlled by a landlord is pertinent to the tenants’ realization of their right to housing.
- Commercial DOH suggests that landlords use direct and indirect practices to maintain and strengthen their business operations. These practices could negatively affect tenants and the broader community.