‘Homeless’ . . . Bad? ‘Unhoused’ . . . Good? What’s In A Name? More Than You Might Think

a monster lurks inside a homeless tent
This scene was created by affordablehousingaction.org and is licensed under CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication
From the lofty heights of middle class condos, is 'homeless' a clarion cry for compassion? Or is it some kind of disgusting self-indugence by depraved people who deserve to be driven into the wilderness?

At affordablehousingaction.org we consider The Guardian one of the world’s great papers, with well-written world-wide in-depth stories about social housing and homelessness. When The GuardianĀ picks up a story, we pay attention: not only is it informative, it not not paywalled, so we can pass it on.

Which sometimes leaves us scrambling to find other sources that present another perspective on a story. So, when The Guardian notifies us that the term ‘homeless’ as a description is serving up toxic overtones, we found support in a news item that we missed two years ago. Read more in the Architectural Digest: Time to Retire the Word ā€˜Homelessā€™ and Opt for ā€˜Houselessā€™ or ā€˜Unhousedā€™ Instead?

And The Guardian: Is it OK to use the word ā€˜homelessā€™ ā€“ or should you say ā€˜unhousedā€™?